↓ Skip to main content

Do NIA‐AA criteria distinguish Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia?

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do NIA‐AA criteria distinguish Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia?
Published in
Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Harris, Jennifer C. Thompson, Claire Gall, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary, Daniel du Plessis, Piyali Pal, David M.A. Mann, Julie S. Snowden, Matthew Jones

Abstract

Clinical criteria are important for improving diagnostic accuracy and ensuring comparability of patient cohorts in research studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,119,639
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#2,963
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,214
of 240,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#72
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.