You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do NIA‐AA criteria distinguish Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal dementia?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.516 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer M. Harris, Jennifer C. Thompson, Claire Gall, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary, Daniel du Plessis, Piyali Pal, David M.A. Mann, Julie S. Snowden, Matthew Jones |
Abstract |
Clinical criteria are important for improving diagnostic accuracy and ensuring comparability of patient cohorts in research studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 33% |
Egypt | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 11 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,119,639
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#2,963
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,214
of 240,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#72
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.