↓ Skip to main content

Concordance between clinical and radiographic evaluations of knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Concordance between clinical and radiographic evaluations of knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40520-017-0847-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille Parsons, Nicholas R. Fuggle, Mark H. Edwards, Lyndsey Goulston, Anna E. Litwic, Darshan Jagannath, Suzan van der Pas, Cyrus Cooper, Elaine M. Dennison, The EPOSA Research Group

Abstract

Significant correlation has been previously demonstrated between radiographic and clinical diagnoses of knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, the specific findings on clinical examination that relate best to a radiographic diagnosis have not been fully elicited. We aimed to explore the relationship between clinical symptoms and physical findings with radiographic diagnoses of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA. This study was based on 409 individuals from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, born between 1931 and 1939. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken of both knees. The presence of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA was defined according to the Kellgren and Lawrence score. Clinical symptoms, assessed using WOMAC, and physical findings were ascertained by examination. Relationships were assessed using multilevel univariate logistic regression. In the 775 knees studied, the prevalence of physical findings was crepitus (25%), tibiofemoral tenderness (15%), bony swelling (12%), and pain on flexion (10%). Thirty-one percent (n = 238) knees demonstrated tibiofemoral OA, 28% (n = 220) showed patellofemoral OA, and 16% demonstrated OA in both locations. A global clinical symptom score was associated with increased risk of tibiofemoral OA (OR 12.5, 95% CI 5.4-29.0) and patellofemoral OA (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.3-13.1). On clinical examination, the presence of crepitus, tibiofemoral tenderness, bony swelling, and pain on flexion was associated with increased risk of tibiofemoral OA; however, only tenderness was found to be associated with patellofemoral OA. Global clinical symptom score was associated with radiographic tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA. However, individual clinical signs were more strongly associated with tibiofemoral than patellofemoral OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 29 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1,086
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,644
of 340,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.