You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key research questions and our capacity to answer them
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.026 |
| Authors |
Don A. Driscoll, David B. Lindenmayer, Andrew F. Bennett, Michael Bode, Ross A. Bradstock, Geoffrey J. Cary, Michael F. Clarke, Nick Dexter, Rod Fensham, Gordon Friend, Malcolm Gill, Stewart James, Geoff Kay, David A. Keith, Christopher MacGregor, Jeremy Russell-Smith, David Salt, James E.M. Watson, Richard J. Williams, Alan York |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| South Africa | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 643 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 137 | 20% |
| Researcher | 127 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 108 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 10% |
| Other | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 102 | 15% |
| Unknown | 109 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 251 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 222 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 5% |
| Unknown | 131 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,239,463
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,611
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,847
of 103,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.