↓ Skip to main content

Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3936-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. R. M. Vogels, K. W. Y. van Barneveld, J. W. A. M. Bosmans, G. Beets, M. J. J. Gijbels, M. H. F. Schreinemacher, N. D. Bouvy

Abstract

Mesh-related adhesions are a significant clinical problem following intraperitoneal mesh placement. In this study, we evaluated adhesion formation to three relatively new meshes for intraperitoneal use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 41%
Engineering 5 14%
Materials Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,309,583
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,787
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,715
of 260,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#92
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.