↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive and dietary risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer in China

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologic Oncology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproductive and dietary risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer in China
Published in
Gynecologic Oncology, January 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.10.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Zhang, Andy H Lee, Colin W Binns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology
#1,869
of 4,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,563
of 143,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.