Title |
Nutritional factors and risk of pancreatic cancer: a population-based case-control study based on direct interview in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gastroenterology, March 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00535-004-1537-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yingsong Lin, Akiko Tamakoshi, Tetsuo Hayakawa, Satoru Naruse, Motoji Kitagawa, Yoshiyuki Ohno |
Abstract |
Few epidemiologic studies have examined the role of nutrient intake in the development of pancreatic cancer in Japan. We addressed this association in a population-based case-control study. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#215
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,159
of 76,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.