↓ Skip to main content

Pherocon AM trapping and the “Whole plant count” method — A comparison of two sampling techniques to estimate the WCR adult densities in Central Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Cereal Research Communications, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 138)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Pherocon AM trapping and the “Whole plant count” method — A comparison of two sampling techniques to estimate the WCR adult densities in Central Europe
Published in
Cereal Research Communications, December 2011
DOI 10.1556/crc.39.2011.2.14
Authors

R. Bažok, I. Sivčev, T. Kos, J. Igrc Barčić, J. Kiss, S. Jankovič

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 71%
Chemistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Cereal Research Communications
#34
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,345
of 249,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cereal Research Communications
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them