| Title |
Combined surface and volume processing for fused joint segmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11548-009-0400-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter R. Krekel, Edward R. Valstar, Frits H. Post, P. M. Rozing, Charl P. Botha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 34% |
| Researcher | 9 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 13 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#225
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,650
of 166,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them