| Title |
Prospects and limitations of microbial pesticides for control of bacterial and fungal pomefruit tree diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trees, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00468-011-0626-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Bonaterra, E. Badosa, J. Cabrefiga, J. Francés, E. Montesinos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,700,702
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#51
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,706
of 134,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them