↓ Skip to main content

Mercury Toxicity and the Mitigating Role of Selenium

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Mercury Toxicity and the Mitigating Role of Selenium
Published in
EcoHealth, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10393-008-0204-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marla J. Berry, Nicholas V. C. Ralston

Abstract

Mercury is a well-known environmental toxicant, particularly in its most common organic form, methylmercury. Consumption of fish and shellfish that contain methylmercury is a dominant source of mercury exposure in humans and piscivorous wildlife. Considerable efforts have focused on assessment of mercury and its attendant risks in the environment and food sources, including the studies reported in this issue. However, studies of mercury intoxication have frequently failed to consider the protective effects of the essential trace element, selenium. Mercury binds to selenium with extraordinarily high affinity, and high maternal exposures inhibit selenium-dependent enzyme activities in fetal brains. However, increased maternal dietary selenium intakes preserve these enzyme activities, thereby preventing the pathological effects that would otherwise arise in their absence. Recent evidence indicates that assessments of mercury exposure and tissue levels need to consider selenium intakes and tissue distributions in order to provide meaningful risk evaluations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 21%
Environmental Science 19 16%
Chemistry 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,091,396
of 24,874,764 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#265
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,207
of 186,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,874,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them