| Title |
Randomised trial of oral versus sequential intravenous/oral cephalosporins in children with pyelonephritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00431-007-0638-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas J. Neuhaus, Christoph Berger, Katja Buechner, Paloma Parvex, Gian Bischoff, Philippe Goetschel, Daniela Husarik, Ulrich Willi, Luciano Molinari, Christoph Rudin, Alain Gervaix, Urs Hunziker, Sergio Stocker, Eric Girardin, David Nadal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 67% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,691,744
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#934
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,767
of 155,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.