↓ Skip to main content

Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided algorithm reduces length of antibiotic treatment in surgical intensive care patients with severe sepsis: results of a prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided algorithm reduces length of antibiotic treatment in surgical intensive care patients with severe sepsis: results of a prospective randomized study
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00423-008-0432-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Schroeder, M. Hochreiter, T. Koehler, A.-M. Schweiger, B. Bein, F. S. Keck, T. von Spiegel

Abstract

Adequate indication and duration of administration are central issues of modern antibiotic treatment in intensive care medicine. The biochemical variable procalcitonin (PCT) is known to indicate systemically relevant bacterial infections with high accuracy. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of PCT for guiding antibiotic treatment in surgical intensive care patients with severe sepsis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Other 18 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#155
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,767
of 183,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them