↓ Skip to main content

Use of recombinant factor VIIa in patients with warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Use of recombinant factor VIIa in patients with warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage
Published in
Neurocritical Care, January 2005
DOI 10.1385/ncc:2:3:263
Pubmed ID
Authors

David L. Brody, Venkatesh Aiyagari, Angela M. Shackleford, Michael N. Diringer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#866
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,859
of 151,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.