| Title |
Acute microflow changes after stop and restart of intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-009-0018-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Jung, Christoph Rödiger, Michael Fritzenwanger, Julia Schumm, Alexander Lauten, Hans R. Figulla, Markus Ferrari |
| Abstract |
The intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation (IABP) is the most frequently used method of mechanical cardiac support in cardiogenic shock (CS). Microcirculatory impairment correlates with outcome in critically ill patients. We therefore investigated the acute influence of IABP therapy on sublingual microflow in patients with CS. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#292
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,014
of 93,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them