You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The validation of a care partner-derived frailty index based upon comprehensive geriatric assessment (CP-FI-CGA) in emergency medical services and geriatric ambulatory care
|
---|---|
Published in |
Age & Ageing, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1093/ageing/afu161 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Judah Goldstein, Ruth E. Hubbard, Paige Moorhouse, Melissa K. Andrew, Arnold Mitnitski, Kenneth Rockwood |
Abstract |
the derivation of a frailty index (FI) based on deficit accumulation from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been criticised as cumbersome. To improve feasibility, we developed a questionnaire based on a CGA that can be completed by care partners (CP-FI-CGA) and assessed its validity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 27% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 19% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,299,403
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#1,037
of 3,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,210
of 273,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#22
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.