↓ Skip to main content

Aβ Influences Cytoskeletal Signaling Cascades with Consequences to Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Aβ Influences Cytoskeletal Signaling Cascades with Consequences to Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12035-014-8913-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Gabriela Henriques, Joana Machado Oliveira, Liliana Patrícia Carvalho, Odete A. B. da Cruz e Silva

Abstract

Abnormal signal transduction events can impact upon the cytoskeleton, affecting the actin and microtubule networks with direct relevance to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cytoskeletal anomalies, in turn, promote atypical neuronal responses, with consequences for cellular organization and function. Neuronal cytoskeletal modifications in AD include neurofibrillary tangles, which result from aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau protein. The latter is a microtubule (MT)-binding protein, whose abnormal phosphorylation leads to MT instability and consequently provokes irregularities in the neuronal trafficking pathways. Early stages of AD are also characterized by synaptic dysfunction and loss of dendritic spines, which correlate with cognitive deficit and impaired brain function. Actin dynamics has a prominent role in maintaining spine plasticity and integrity, thus providing the basis for memory and learning processes. Hence, factors that disrupt both actin and MT network dynamics will compromise neuronal function and survival. The peptide Aβ is the major component of senile plaques and has been described as a pivotal mediator of neuronal dystrophy and synaptic loss in AD. Here, we review Aβ-mediated effects on both MT and actin networks and focus on the relevance of the elicited cytoskeletal signaling events targeted in AD pathology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,778
of 3,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,011
of 260,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#50
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.