You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of Dysfunctional Myocardium by Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1161/01.cir.0000085993.93936.ba |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick R. Knuesel, Daniel Nanz, Christophe Wyss, Martin Buechi, Philip A. Kaufmann, Gustav K. von Schulthess, Thomas F. Lüscher, Juerg Schwitter |
| Abstract |
Metabolic assessment of dysfunctional myocardium by PET allows prediction of functional recovery after revascularization. Contrast-enhanced MR (ce-MR) discriminates transmural distribution of viable and scar tissue with excellent spatial resolution. Both techniques were applied in ischemic chronic left ventricular dysfunction to relate metabolism and tissue composition to changes of contractile function after revascularization. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 57% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#12,063
of 21,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,931
of 54,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#92
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.