| Title |
Multicentric Study on Robotic Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-010-0909-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessio Pigazzi, Fabrizio Luca, Alberto Patriti, Manuela Valvo, Graziano Ceccarelli, Luciano Casciola, Roberto Biffi, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Jeong-Heum Baek |
| Abstract |
Recently, traditional laparoscopic anterior resection has been used for rectal cancer, offering good functional results compared with open resection and resulting in better early postoperative outcomes. Few studies investigating the role of robot-assisted tumor-specific rectal surgery (RTSRS) have been carried out to show its feasibility. The aim of the study was to verify on a multicentric basis the perioperative and oncologic outcome of RTSRS. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 54% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,775,993
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,124
of 6,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,161
of 164,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.