| Title |
A cost minimisation analysis in teledermatology: model-based approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-251 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Eminović, Marcel G Dijkgraaf, Rosanne M Berghout, Astrid H Prins, Patrick JE Bindels, Nicolette F de Keizer |
| Abstract |
Although store-and-forward teledermatology is increasingly becoming popular, evidence on its effects on efficiency and costs is lacking. The aim of this study, performed in addition to a clustered randomised trial, was to investigate to what extent and under which conditions store-and-forward teledermatology can reduce costs from a societal perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Oman | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,909,401
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,900
of 8,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,799
of 100,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.