↓ Skip to main content

Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): a ten point ‘survival analysis’

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): a ten point ‘survival analysis’
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00737-017-0789-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Cox

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,500,667
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#324
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,063
of 330,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.