↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10897-012-9564-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia L. Devers, Amy Cronister, Kelly E. Ormond, Flavia Facio, Campbell K. Brasington, Pamela Flodman

Abstract

The 1997 discovery of free fetal DNA in maternal plasma launched clinical researchers' efforts to establish a reliable method for non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal genetic conditions. Various methods, including, but not limited to, massively parallel sequencing (MPS) and selective analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, have recently been developed as highly sensitive and specific noninvasive screening tools for common fetal chromosome aneuploidies. Incorporating these new noninvasive technologies into clinical practice will impact the current prenatal screening paradigm for fetal aneuploidy, in which genetic counseling plays an integral role. The National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) currently supports Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPT/NIPD) as an option for patients whose pregnancies are considered to be at an increased risk for certain chromosome abnormalities. NSGC urges that NIPT/NIPD only be offered in the context of informed consent, education, and counseling by a qualified provider, such as a certified genetic counselor. Patients whose NIPT/NIPD results are abnormal, or who have other factors suggestive of a chromosome abnormality, should receive genetic counseling and be given the option of standard confirmatory diagnostic testing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 176 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 18%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 29 16%