↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment of Monteggia variant fracture dislocations of the elbow in adults: surgical technique and clinical outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Surgical treatment of Monteggia variant fracture dislocations of the elbow in adults: surgical technique and clinical outcomes
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00590-017-1953-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hosam E. Matar, Pavel I. Akimau, David Stanley, Amjid A. Ali

Abstract

Monteggia variant defined as Monteggia fracture dislocation with radial head or neck fracture, coronoid fracture, ulnohumeral joint dislocation or combination of these injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of Monteggia variant fracture dislocations with focus on the operative technique and management of associated radial head fractures. Between January 2008 and January 2014, 22 patients (7 men, 15 women) with a mean age of 58.9 years (45-77 years) and unilateral Monteggia variant were included. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years (2.2-6.6 years). Patients underwent clinical and functional assessment using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and the Oxford Elbow Score. Eighteen patients had radial head fractures; in five patients the fracture fragment involved less than one-third of the radial head and the fragment was excised, in four patients the radial head fracture was fixed with headless screws and in nine patients the radial head was replaced. At review the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index was 76.6 (20-100) and the Oxford Elbow Score 35 (4-48). Our experience suggests that satisfactory outcomes can be obtained in the treatment of the complex Monteggia variant fracture dislocations by recognising the injury pattern and addressing all components of the injury in order to achieve elbow stability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,716,759
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#554
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,043
of 310,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.