↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of physiotherapist-delivered group education and exercise interventions to promote self-management for people with osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: A rapid review Part I

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of physiotherapist-delivered group education and exercise interventions to promote self-management for people with osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: A rapid review Part I
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2014.10.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine Toomey, Laura Currie-Murphy, James Matthews, Deirdre A. Hurley

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) are two of the most common and costly musculoskeletal conditions globally. Healthcare service demands mean that multiple condition group-based interventions are of increasing clinical interest, but no reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of group-based physiotherapy-led self-management interventions (GPSMI) for both conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 19%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 54 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 19%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 57 28%