↓ Skip to main content

A modelling approach for estimating the frequency of sea level extremes and the impact of climate change in southeast Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
A modelling approach for estimating the frequency of sea level extremes and the impact of climate change in southeast Australia
Published in
Natural Hazards, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9383-2
Authors

K. L. McInnes, I. Macadam, G. D. Hubbert, J. G. O’Grady

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Other 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 32%
Environmental Science 16 17%
Engineering 16 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#836
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,692
of 93,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.