↓ Skip to main content

Comparative phylogeography of a vulnerable bat and its ectoparasite reveals dispersal of a non-mobile parasite among distinct evolutionarily significant units of the host

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Comparative phylogeography of a vulnerable bat and its ectoparasite reveals dispersal of a non-mobile parasite among distinct evolutionarily significant units of the host
Published in
Conservation Genetics, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10592-017-1024-9
Authors

J. van Schaik, D. Dekeukeleire, S. Gazaryan, I. Natradze, G. Kerth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 8 18%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,374,935
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#844
of 1,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,138
of 335,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.