↓ Skip to main content

Response surface models for the Leybourne unit root tests and lag order dependence

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Statistics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Response surface models for the Leybourne unit root tests and lag order dependence
Published in
Computational Statistics, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00180-011-0268-y
Authors

Jesús Otero, Jeremy Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 8%
Denmark 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 17%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,482,347
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Computational Statistics
#100
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,392
of 115,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Statistics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.