| Title |
Reconceptualizing Working Memory in Educational Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational Psychology Review, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10648-014-9286-y |
| Authors |
Barbara Fenesi, Faria Sana, Joseph A. Kim, David I. Shore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,480,508
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#478
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,384
of 275,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.