↓ Skip to main content

Microbial biofilms: biosurfactants as antibiofilm agents

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
Title
Microbial biofilms: biosurfactants as antibiofilm agents
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00253-014-6169-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibrahim M. Banat, Mayri A. Díaz De Rienzo, Gerry A. Quinn

Abstract

Current microbial inhibition strategies based on planktonic bacterial physiology have been known to have limited efficacy on the growth of biofilm communities. This problem can be exacerbated by the emergence of increasingly resistant clinical strains. All aspects of biofilm measurement, monitoring, dispersal, control, and inhibition are becoming issues of increasing importance. Biosurfactants have merited renewed interest in both clinical and hygienic sectors due to their potential to disperse microbial biofilms in addition to many other advantages. The dispersal properties of biosurfactants have been shown to rival those of conventional inhibitory agents against bacterial and yeast biofilms. This makes them suitable candidates for use in new generations of microbial dispersal agents and for use as adjuvants for existing microbial suppression or eradication strategies. In this review, we explore aspects of biofilm characteristics and examine the contribution of biologically derived surface-active agents (biosurfactants) to the disruption or inhibition of microbial biofilms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 354 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 22%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Student > Master 43 12%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 86 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 11%
Engineering 25 7%
Environmental Science 17 5%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 103 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,764,167
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,616
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,810
of 265,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#26
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.