Title |
A General Unified Framework to Assess the Sampling Variance of Heritability Estimates Using Pedigree or Marker-Based Relationships
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1534/genetics.114.171017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter M. Visscher, Michael E. Goddard |
Abstract |
Heritability is a population parameter of importance in evolution, plant and animal breeding and human medical genetics. It can be estimated using pedigree designs and, more recently, using relationships estimated from markers. We derive the sampling variance of the estimate of heritability for a wide range of experimental designs, assuming that estimation is by maximum likelihood and that the resemblance between relatives is solely due to additive genetic variation. We show that well-known results for balanced designs are special cases of a more general unified framework. For pedigree designs the sampling variance is inversely proportional to the variance of relationship in the pedigree and it is proportional to 1/N whereas for population samples it is approximately proportional to 1/N(2) where N is the sample size. Variation in relatedness is a key parameter in the quantification of the sampling variance of heritability. Consequently, the sampling variance is high for populations with large recent effective population size (e.g. humans) because this causes low variation in relationship. However, even using human population samples, low sampling variance is possible with high N. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 36 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |