| Title |
Risk and protective factors for peer victimization: a 1-year follow-up study of urban American students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00787-013-0507-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Karlsson, Andrew Stickley, Frank Lindblad, Mary Schwab-Stone, Vladislav Ruchkin |
| Abstract |
This study examined whether internalizing problems, parental warmth and teacher support were associated with adolescents' experience of future peer victimization in school. Data were drawn from two rounds of the longitudinal Social and Health Assessment (SAHA). Study subjects comprised 593 US urban adolescents (aged 13.8 ± 0.8 years; 56 % female). Results showed that there was a substantial degree of continuity in peer victimization over a 1-year period. The presence of internalizing (anxiety, depressive and somatic) symptoms at baseline was associated with an increased risk of peer victimization over time. Both parental warmth and teacher support were uniquely associated with a lower risk for peer victimization. Implications of these findings for prevention efforts are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,098,984
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#422
of 1,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,090
of 306,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.