You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of health effects of electronic cigarettes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Preventive Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotta Pisinger, Martin Døssing |
| Abstract |
To provide a systematic review of the existing literature on health consequences of vaporing of electronic cigarettes (ECs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 170 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 15% |
| United States | 18 | 11% |
| Canada | 14 | 8% |
| Spain | 9 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 5% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Finland | 4 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 4 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 61 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 12% |
| Scientists | 21 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 878 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 862 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 150 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 130 | 15% |
| Researcher | 100 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 155 | 18% |
| Unknown | 236 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 190 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 51 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 219 | 25% |
| Unknown | 272 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#178,477
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#88
of 5,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,576
of 269,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.