↓ Skip to main content

Towards a better understanding of the therapeutic applications and corresponding mechanisms of action of honey

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Towards a better understanding of the therapeutic applications and corresponding mechanisms of action of honey
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-0567-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rifat Ullah Khan, Shabana Naz, Alaeldein M. Abudabos

Abstract

Honey is a bee-derived supersaturated solution composed of complex contents mainly glucose, fructose, amino acids, vitamins, and minerals. Composition of honey may vary due to the difference in nectar, season, geography, and storage condition. Honey has been used since times immemorial in folk medicine and has recently been rediscovered as an excellent therapeutic agent. In the past, honey was used for a variety of ailments without knowing the scientific background and active ingredients of honey. Today, honey has been scientifically proven for its antioxidant, regulation of glycemic response, antitumor, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and cardiovascular potentiating agent. It can be used as a wound dressing and healing substance. Honey is different in color, flavor, sensory perception, and medical response. Apart from highlighting the nutritional facts of honey, we collected the finding of the published literature to know the mechanism of action of honey in different diseases. This review covers the composition, physiochemical characteristics, and some medical uses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 7 6%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 48 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 49 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,303,413
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#544
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,871
of 332,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#20
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.