↓ Skip to main content

The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter

Overview of attention for article published in R&D Management, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
599 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1171 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble
Published in
R&D Management, May 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
Authors

Mark Dodgson, David Gann, Ammon Salter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 29 2%
United States 11 <1%
Brazil 11 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Netherlands 7 <1%
Italy 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Sweden 5 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Other 26 2%
Unknown 1059 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 279 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 224 19%
Student > Bachelor 107 9%
Researcher 98 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 85 7%
Other 205 18%
Unknown 173 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 583 50%
Engineering 107 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 84 7%
Computer Science 59 5%
Social Sciences 55 5%
Other 86 7%
Unknown 197 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from R&D Management
#135
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,379
of 86,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from R&D Management
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.