↓ Skip to main content

How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study
Published in
Scientometrics, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1439-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcin Kozak, Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff

Abstract

Did the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991 influence the scientific performance of the researchers in Eastern European countries? Did this historical event affect international collaboration by researchers from the Eastern European countries with those of Western countries? Did it also change international collaboration among researchers from the Eastern European countries? Trying to answer these questions, this study aims to shed light on international collaboration by researchers from the Eastern European countries (Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia). The number of publications and normalized citation impact values are compared for these countries based on InCites (Thomson Reuters), from 1981 up to 2011. The international collaboration by researchers affiliated to institutions in Eastern European countries at the time points of 1990, 2000 and 2011 was studied with the help of Pajek and VOSviewer software, based on data from the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters). Our results show that the breakdown of the communist regime did not lead, on average, to a huge improvement in the publication performance of the Eastern European countries and that the increase in international co-authorship relations by the researchers affiliated to institutions in these countries was smaller than expected. Most of the Eastern European countries are still subject to changes and are still awaiting their boost in scientific development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Other 11 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 9 9%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 33 31%
Computer Science 12 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,093,532
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#933
of 2,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,983
of 267,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.