↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative Assessment of Autism Symptom-related Traits in Probands and Parents: Broader Phenotype Autism Symptom Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Quantitative Assessment of Autism Symptom-related Traits in Probands and Parents: Broader Phenotype Autism Symptom Scale
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0182-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine Dawson, Annette Estes, Jeffrey Munson, Gerard Schellenberg, Raphael Bernier, Robert Abbott

Abstract

Autism susceptibility genes likely have effects on continuously distributed autism-related traits, yet few measures of such traits exist. The Broader Phenotype Autism Symptom Scale (BPASS), developed for use with affected children and family members, measures social motivation, social expressiveness, conversational skills, and flexibility. Based on 201 multiplex families, psychometric data on the BPASS are reported. Adequate inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were found. Parents had lower BPASS scores than affected children, after controlling for IQ. Parents and affected children showed overlapping distributions suggesting the BPASS captured variability in traits across groups. BPASS scores were not correlated with ethnicity or parent education; however, some domains were correlated with IQ. The BPASS holds promise as a quantitative phenotypic assessment for genetic studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,891,519
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,593
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,985
of 66,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.