↓ Skip to main content

The great beetle debate: a study in imagining with names

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The great beetle debate: a study in imagining with names
Published in
Philosophical Studies, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9485-4
Authors

Stacie Friend

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 12 63%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,382,900
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#941
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,718
of 165,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.