| Title |
A Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Clinician Views on Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Child Mental Health and Diabetes Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-014-0586-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miranda Wolpert, Katherine Curtis-Tyler, Julian Edbrooke-Childs |
| Abstract |
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are increasingly being recommended for use in both mental and physical health services. The present study is a qualitative exploration of the views of young people, mothers, and clinicians on PROMs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of n = 10 participants (6 young people, 4 clinicians) from mental health services and n = 14 participants (4 young people, 7 mothers, 3 clinicians) from a diabetes service. For different reasons, young people, mothers, and clinicians saw feedback from PROMs as having the potential to alter the scope of clinical discussions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,165,451
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#260
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,575
of 239,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.