| Title |
Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13047-014-0044-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-Chi Lee, Gloria Lin, Mao-Jiun J Wang |
| Abstract |
Foot dimension information on different user groups is important for footwear design and clinical applications. Foot dimension data collected using different measurement methods presents accuracy problems. This study compared the precision and accuracy of the 3D foot scanning method with conventional foot dimension measurement methods including the digital caliper, ink footprint and digital footprint. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 36 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Design | 12 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |