You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating protected area effectiveness using bird lists in the Australian Wet Tropics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diversity & Distributions, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ddi.12274 |
| Authors |
Megan Barnes, Judit K. Szabo, William K. Morris, Hugh Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 10% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,835,760
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#510
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,750
of 275,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.