↓ Skip to main content

What Predicts a Successful Life? A Life‐course Model of Well‐being

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 2,992)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
64 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Predicts a Successful Life? A Life‐course Model of Well‐being
Published in
Economic Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/ecoj.12170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Layard, Andrew E Clark, Francesca Cornaglia, Nattavudh Powdthavee, James Vernoit

Abstract

Policy-makers who care about well-being need a recursive model of how adult life-satisfaction is predicted by childhood influences, acting both directly and (indirectly) through adult circumstances. We estimate such a model using the British Cohort Study (1970). We show that the most powerful childhood predictor of adult life-satisfaction is the child's emotional health, followed by the child's conduct. The least powerful predictor is the child's intellectual development. This may have implications for educational policy. Among adult circumstances, family income accounts for only 0.5% of the variance of life-satisfaction. Mental and physical health are much more important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 298 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 20%
Student > Master 47 15%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 52 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 67 22%
Psychology 65 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 51 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 4%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 60 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#285,363
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Economic Journal
#46
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,827
of 276,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Journal
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.