↓ Skip to main content

When mixed methods produce mixed results: Integrating disparate findings about miscarriage and women's wellbeing

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Health Psychology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When mixed methods produce mixed results: Integrating disparate findings about miscarriage and women's wellbeing
Published in
British Journal of Health Psychology, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/bjhp.12121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Lee, Ingrid J. Rowlands

Abstract

To discuss an example of mixed methods in health psychology, involving separate quantitative and qualitative studies of women's mental health in relation to miscarriage, in which the two methods produced different but complementary results, and to consider ways in which the findings can be integrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Other 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,832,215
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#284
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,540
of 268,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.