| Title |
Identifying species, sex and individual tigers and leopards in the Malenad-Mysore Tiger Landscape, Western Ghats, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-014-0371-9 |
| Authors |
Samrat Mondol, N. Samba Kumar, Arjun Gopalaswamy, Kartik Sunagar, K. Ullas Karanth, Uma Ramakrishnan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,743,964
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#22
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,528
of 260,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.