↓ Skip to main content

Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
295 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
870 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
Authors

Paul Resta, Thérèse Laferrière

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 870 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 43 5%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 23 3%
Unknown 768 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 181 21%
Student > Master 134 15%
Researcher 72 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 70 8%
Lecturer 52 6%
Other 228 26%
Unknown 133 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 323 37%
Computer Science 132 15%
Psychology 50 6%
Arts and Humanities 40 5%
Linguistics 32 4%
Other 139 16%
Unknown 154 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,203,666
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#377
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,894
of 160,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.