↓ Skip to main content

Genetic algorithm learning in a New Keynesian macroeconomic setup

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Genetic algorithm learning in a New Keynesian macroeconomic setup
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00191-017-0511-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cars Hommes, Tomasz Makarewicz, Domenico Massaro, Tom Smits

Abstract

In order to understand heterogeneous behavior amongst agents, empirical data from Learning-to-Forecast (LtF) experiments can be used to construct learning models. This paper follows up on Assenza et al. (2013) by using a Genetic Algorithms (GA) model to replicate the results from their LtF experiment. In this GA model, individuals optimize an adaptive, a trend following and an anchor coefficient in a population of general prediction heuristics. We replicate experimental treatments in a New-Keynesian environment with increasing complexity and use Monte Carlo simulations to investigate how well the model explains the experimental data. We find that the evolutionary learning model is able to replicate the three different types of behavior, i.e. convergence to steady state, stable oscillations and dampened oscillations in the treatments using one GA model. Heterogeneous behavior can thus be explained by an adaptive, anchor and trend extrapolating component and the GA model can be used to explain heterogeneous behavior in LtF experiments with different types of complexity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,304,466
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#214
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,827
of 313,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.