↓ Skip to main content

CD169+ macrophages are critical for osteoblast maintenance and promote intramembranous and endochondral ossification during bone repair

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD169+ macrophages are critical for osteoblast maintenance and promote intramembranous and endochondral ossification during bone repair
Published in
Clinical Materials, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lena Batoon, Susan Marie Millard, Martin Eduard Wullschleger, Corina Preda, Andy Chiu-Ku Wu, Simranpreet Kaur, Hsu-Wen Tseng, David Arthur Hume, Jean-Pierre Levesque, Liza Jane Raggatt, Allison Robyn Pettit

Abstract

Osteal macrophages (osteomacs) contribute to bone homeostasis and regeneration. To further distinguish their functions from osteoclasts, which share many markers and growth factor requirements, we developed a rapid, enzyme-free osteomac enrichment protocol that permitted characterization of minimally manipulated osteomacs by flow cytometry. Osteomacs differ from osteoclasts in expression of Siglec1 (CD169). This distinction was confirmed using the CD169-diphtheria toxin (DT) receptor (DTR) knock-in model. DT treatment of naïve CD169-DTR mice resulted in selective and striking loss of osteomacs, whilst osteoclasts and trabecular bone area were unaffected. Consistent with a previously-reported trophic interaction, osteomac loss was accompanied by a concomitant and proportionately striking reduction in osteoblasts. The impact of CD169(+) macrophage depletion was assessed in two models of bone injury that heal via either intramembranous (tibial injury) or endochondral (internally-plated femoral fracture model) ossification. In both models, CD169(+) macrophage, including osteomac depletion compromised bone repair. Importantly, DT treatment in CD169-DTR mice did not affect osteoclast frequency in either model. In the femoral fracture model, the magnitude of callus formation correlated with the number of F4/80(+) macrophages that persisted within the callus. Overall these observations provide compelling support that CD169(+) osteomacs, independent of osteoclasts, provide vital pro-anabolic support to osteoblasts during both bone homeostasis and repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Materials Science 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,143,972
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#1,853
of 10,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,866
of 338,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#20
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.