Title |
Impact of long-term lifestyle programmes on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese participants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-130 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lukas Schwingshackl, Sofia Dias, Georg Hoffmann |
Abstract |
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term efficacy of diet plus exercise (D + E) vs. diet (D), D + E vs. exercise (E) and D vs. E on anthropometric outcomes and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
United States | 5 | 17% |
Spain | 2 | 7% |
Ireland | 2 | 7% |
Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 20% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 214 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
Researcher | 22 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Other | 45 | 21% |
Unknown | 45 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 21 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 12% |
Unknown | 53 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#324,102
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#29
of 2,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,156
of 275,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.