| Title |
The impact of the introduced Digitonthophagus gazella on a native dung beetle community in Brazil during 26 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-017-1603-1 |
| Authors |
Walter Mesquita Filho, Carlos A. H. Flechtmann, Wesley. A. C. Godoy, Ottar N. Bjornstad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,678,508
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#699
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,657
of 329,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#28
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.