↓ Skip to main content

Data-driven stochastic modelling of zebrafish locomotion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Data-driven stochastic modelling of zebrafish locomotion
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00285-014-0843-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Zienkiewicz, David A.W. Barton, Maurizio Porfiri, Mario di Bernardo

Abstract

In this work, we develop a data-driven modelling framework to reproduce the locomotion of fish in a confined environment. Specifically, we highlight the primary characteristics of the motion of individual zebrafish (Danio rerio), and study how these can be suitably encapsulated within a mathematical framework utilising a limited number of calibrated model parameters. Using data captured from individual zebrafish via automated visual tracking, we develop a model using stochastic differential equations and describe fish as a self propelled particle moving in a plane. Based on recent experimental evidence of the importance of speed regulation in social behaviour, we extend stochastic models of fish locomotion by introducing experimentally-derived processes describing dynamic speed regulation. Salient metrics are defined which are then used to calibrate key parameters of coupled stochastic differential equations, describing both speed and angular speed of swimming fish. The effects of external constraints are also included, based on experimentally observed responses. Understanding the spontaneous dynamics of zebrafish using a bottom-up, purely data-driven approach is expected to yield a modelling framework for quantitative investigation of individual behaviour in the presence of various external constraints or biological assays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Student > Master 16 20%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Computer Science 6 8%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Mathematics 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#5,985,070
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#110
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,612
of 260,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.