| Title |
Clinicians’ Views and Experiences of Interventions to Enhance the Quality of Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3076-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sibyl Anthierens, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Jochen W. Cals, Samuel Coenen, Lucy Yardley, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Patricia Fernandez-Vandellos, Jaroslaw Krawczyk, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Carl Llor, Christopher C. Butler, Theo Verheij, Herman Goossens, Paul Little, Nick A. Francis, on behalf of the GRACE/CHAMP INTRO team |
| Abstract |
Evidence shows a high rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in primary care in Europe and the United States. Given the costs of widespread use and associated antibiotic resistance, reducing inappropriate use is a public health priority. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,811,312
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,976
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,318
of 266,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#42
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.