| Title |
Institutional Performance and Vote Buying in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studies in Comparative International Development, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12116-017-9254-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver Heath, Louise Tillin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 24% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,449,678
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#64
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,488
of 343,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them